What the 18-Month Receivables Window Means for Banks and Credit Unions
This article draws on findings from a Datos Insights research paper commissioned by CheckAlt. For commercial banks and credit unions under US$30...
3 min read
By Benjamin Nestor, Strategic Advisor, Commercial Banking & Payments, Datos Insights
Get the full CheckAlt-commissioned benchmark study managed by Datos Insights.
This article draws on findings from a Datos Insights research paper commissioned by CheckAlt.
For commercial banks and credit unions under US$30 billion in assets, the conversation around receivables and payments technology has moved beyond solely looking at operational savings. Datos Insights research shows that almost 90% of surveyed financial institution (FI) executives believe improved receivables and payments capabilities could drive commercial banking revenue, and two-thirds expect to increase technology spending in this area over the next 12 to 18 months.
The case for modernization is no longer just about trimming back-office costs. Instead, the focus has shifted toward retaining commercial clients, defending fee income, and protecting the deposit and float economics tied to commercial operating accounts.
A new Datos Insights research paper, commissioned by CheckAlt, examines the timing of the current evaluation cycle, vendor selection criteria, technology spend, and the adoption barriers shaping receivables and payment processing priorities. The findings draw on a Q1 to Q2 2026 survey of senior decision-makers at U.S. banks and credit unions with US$30 billion or less in assets.
Actively evaluating or plan to evaluate vendors within 18 months
The vendor evaluation cycle suggests that the market will soon be defined by early adopters and fast followers. Almost 20% of surveyed FIs report active evaluation today, 32% plan to begin within 12 months, and another 25% target a 12-to-18-month start. In aggregate, three-quarters of mid-size and community FIs will move through vendor selection within the next 18 months.
That timing creates a near-term planning window for FIs to assess vendor options, integration requirements, and budget priorities before peer institutions move further into implementation.
Rank core integration as the top vendor evaluation factor
Among surveyed executives, 80% rank seamless integration with the core banking system as the most important capability in a receivables and payments vendor, above all other evaluation factors. The intensity of that preference reflects hard-learned lessons about the operational cost of weak integration on prior modernization projects.
The full report explores why core integration is becoming more than a technical requirement. It affects cash visibility, exception handling, reconciliation, implementation risk, and the client experience FIs are trying to deliver.
Nearly 30% of surveyed institutions identify loss of commercial clients to competitors with stronger technology as the primary risk of stalled modernization. The financial consequence of losing a major commercial relationship extends well beyond the direct revenue associated with that client. It typically includes cross-sell foregone across treasury management, referrals lost when the primary relationship moves, and the deposit, float, and balance economics tied to the operating account. These are meaningful components of commercial banking profitability that do not appear on the receivables P&L line.
Cite client loss to competitors as the top risk of stalled modernization
The revenue case also extends beyond retention. Stronger receivables and payment capabilities can support competitive RFPs, deepen existing commercial relationships, and create opportunities to attach receivables and payments services to lending-led relationships. The full report explores these revenue pathways in more detail, including how real-time visibility and integrated reporting may support stronger pricing, retention, and relationship expansion.
Identify competing IT priorities as the top barrier to modernization
Almost 60% of surveyed FIs identify competing IT priorities as the principal obstacle to modernization. Internal IT teams in this segment are typically overstrained, and adding a receivables and payments program to that portfolio under conventional delivery assumptions is not realistic for many institutions.
The report also examines how delivery models, implementation support, phased approaches, and vendor selection criteria can help FIs move from evaluation to execution without overloading internal teams.
The market does not require every FI to implement in 2026, but it does call for a defined strategic position before year-end. That means a vendor short list, an internal point of view on integration architecture, a preferred delivery model, and a budgeted multi-year plan. Institutions without a clear position heading into late 2026 will face not only ongoing operational challenges and missed revenue opportunities, but also the disadvantages that come from competing with earlier adopters.
Download the full report to explore the complete findings and learn how banks and credit unions can evaluate, prioritize, and activate their receivables and payment processing strategy in the current market window.
Get the full CheckAlt-commissioned benchmark study managed by Datos Insights.
Share this article
This article draws on findings from a Datos Insights research paper commissioned by CheckAlt. For commercial banks and credit unions under US$30...
Why the shift from generative AI to agentic AI matters for payments and receivablesworkflows. Watch the Video: AI In Payments & Receivables: From...
Editor’s Note: This article has been updated from its original publication in April 2021. Faster payment expectations are changing how organizations...